top of page

Intermediate Track Fixed Recoverable Costs: Band 1–4 Figures Explained

  • 4 hours ago
  • 3 min read


The Intermediate Track Fixed Recoverable Costs regime applies to many civil claims valued between £25,000 and £100,000. Within this system, recoverable costs are determined by Complexity Band allocation, which places the case within Band 1 to Band 4. Each band has its own fixed costs grid, determining the level of recoverable costs at every stage of litigation. Because the difference between the lowest and highest bands can be substantial, understanding the actual figures allowed within each band is essential when assessing litigation exposure or settlement strategy.

For a detailed explanation of how courts decide band allocation, see our guide to Intermediate Track Complexity Bands.


How Fixed Recoverable Costs Work in the Intermediate Track


Under the Fixed Recoverable Costs (FRC) regime, the amount of recoverable costs does not depend on the time spent by solicitors or the hourly rates charged.

Instead, costs are determined by a prescribed table set out in the Civil Procedure Rules, with figures varying according to:


  • The Complexity Band

  • The stage reached in the litigation

  • Whether the claim proceeds to trial


This means that band allocation directly determines the costs available to the successful party.


Intermediate Track Complexity Bands


Intermediate Track claims are allocated to four complexity bands.

Band

Typical case type

Band 1

Simplest cases with limited issues

Band 2

Standard litigation such as many RTA or personal injury claims

Band 3

Moderately complex disputes including NIHL or complex employer’s liability

Band 4

Most complex Intermediate Track cases including professional negligence or substantial property disputes

Higher bands allow significantly greater recoverable costs at each stage.

For a full explanation of band allocation see: Intermediate Track Complexity Bands.


Intermediate Track Fixed Recoverable Costs by Band


Below is an overview of typical recoverable costs available at key stages of litigation.

(Figures are simplified examples for explanatory purposes and may vary depending on claim value and stage progression.)


Band 1 – Simplest Intermediate Track Cases

Typical recoverable costs:

Litigation Stage

Typical Recoverable Costs

Pre-issue

~£8,000

Post-issue to allocation

~£10,000

Pre-trial preparation

~£12,000

Trial advocacy fee

~£6,000

Band 1 cases generally involve straightforward disputes with limited evidence and short trials.


Band 2 – Standard Intermediate Track Claims

Typical recoverable costs:

Litigation Stage

Typical Recoverable Costs

Pre-issue

~£9,500

Post-issue to allocation

~£12,000

Pre-trial preparation

~£15,000

Trial advocacy fee

~£7,500

Band 2 represents the most common band for Intermediate Track litigation.


Band 3 – More Complex Intermediate Track Disputes

Typical recoverable costs:

Litigation Stage

Typical Recoverable Costs

Pre-issue

~£11,000

Post-issue to allocation

~£15,000

Pre-trial preparation

~£19,000

Trial advocacy fee

~£9,500

Band 3 cases often involve significant expert evidence or multiple contested issues.


Band 4 – Most Complex Intermediate Track Cases

Typical recoverable costs:

Litigation Stage

Typical Recoverable Costs

Pre-issue

~£13,000

Post-issue to allocation

~£18,000

Pre-trial preparation

~£23,000

Trial advocacy fee

~£11,000

Band 4 cases represent the highest level of complexity permitted within the Intermediate Track.


Why These Figures Matter


Because costs are fixed under the regime, the Complexity Band assigned to the case becomes critically important.

The difference between Band 1 and Band 4 can result in:


  • Substantially higher trial advocacy fees

  • Greater recoverable litigation costs

  • Increased settlement leverage


For that reason, disputes about band allocation have become a central tactical issue in civil litigation.


When Disputes Arise About Costs


Even within a fixed costs regime, disputes can still arise regarding:


  • The correct complexity band

  • Whether certain work falls inside or outside the FRC regime

  • Application of the correct costs grid

  • Recovery of additional costs not covered by fixed tables


These issues frequently arise during costs assessment proceedings. Learn more about our Detailed Assessment Paying Party Services.


Strategic Importance of Early Costs Advice


Because band allocation determines the entire recoverable costs structure, early strategic advice can be critical.

Specialist costs advice may assist with:


  • Challenging incorrect complexity band allocation

  • Assessing Fixed Recoverable Costs exposure

  • Advising on settlement strategy

  • Handling disputes arising during detailed assessment


SPH Costs regularly advises on Fixed Recoverable Costs disputes, complexity band allocation and assessment strategy. Learn more about our Paying Party Costs Lawyer Services.


Frequently Asked Questions About Intermediate Track Fixed Recoverable Costs


Are Intermediate Track costs always fixed?


Yes. In most cases the Civil Procedure Rules prescribe fixed costs that apply regardless of the time spent by solicitors.


Do higher complexity bands allow higher costs?


Yes. Each complexity band has a separate costs grid, meaning higher bands allow significantly greater recoverable costs.


Can parties dispute the band used to calculate costs?


Yes. Band allocation can be contested at the allocation stage and may become an issue during costs disputes later in the litigation.


Do all claims between £25,000 and £100,000 fall into the Intermediate Track?


No. Cases must also meet criteria relating to trial length, expert evidence and complexity. Some cases within this value range may still be allocated to the Multi-Track.


Related Guide

For a full explanation of how courts decide band allocation see: Intermediate Track Complexity Bands.

 
 

Disclaimer

The content of this blog is provided for general information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The views expressed are those of SPH Costing Services Ltd and do not necessarily reflect the views of any instructing solicitor or client. No reliance should be placed on this content in relation to any specific matter, and independent legal advice should always be sought. SPH Costing Services Ltd accepts no liability for any loss or consequence arising from reliance on the information published.

bottom of page